Four channels, fourteen regions, 104 weeks. The model found that the most defended line item on the plan was the least defensible.
of working media reallocated under a flat total budget
adstock multiplier on television
regions where print failed the breakeven test
holdout R² on a blocked 20-week validation window
The client planned media on a channel ROI dashboard built from last-click platform reporting. Paid search looked extraordinary, television looked mediocre, and print looked adequate. Every one of those three readings was an artefact of the measurement window rather than a fact about the market, and the annual plan had been built on them for three consecutive years.
Carryover differed by an order of magnitude across the plan. Television held a 2.5-week half-life; paid search held 0.7. Once both were expressed as cumulative adstock rather than same-week spend, television's contribution roughly doubled and search's fell by about a third.
Print's decay rate was healthy, which is why it had survived. But circulation overlapped heavily with television reach, and once that overlap was modelled, print's incremental contribution did not clear its cost of delivery in eleven of fourteen regions.